The relation between natural and sexual selection – study case on the phenotypic characteristics that influence mate choice in a North-West Romanian human population

Authors

  • Sînziana Alexandra POPA-CORDUN Babeș-Bolyai University, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, 5-7 Clinicilor Str., 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. *Corresponding author: popacsinziana@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-8017
  • Alexandru N. STERMIN Babeș-Bolyai University, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, 5-7 Clinicilor Str., 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-6498

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2019.2.02

Keywords:

clinal variation, hair color, parental imprinting.

Abstract

The force of sexual selection acts upon the mating process of all beings, this great force is influenced by different factors as phenotypic characteristics. Related to mate choice, in humans, recent studies have shown that, along with eye color, hair color is considered a relevant physical trait (Frost, 2006). Thereby, the purpose of this study is to reveal how these two factors influence mate choice by analyzing the hair color preference of a small population from Romania. Additionally, we explore how different types of selection influence each other and assume that both contribute in choosing a partner. In order to obtain basic data, a socio-demographic survey was addressed to adult male and female individuals. Based on their answers, disregarding the gender, a considerable number of individuals are brown-haired, as we expected from this area of the globe. Among the results obtained, the following considerations are worth mentioning: the most common hair color in Romania is brown, individuals with this trait are considered the most attractive for the opposite sex and parents’ hair color represents a predictor for future partners. These preferences are both in concordance and in contrast with natural selection. However, much more research is needed, approaching other areas such as genetics and forensics to determine how all these mechanisms, as well as others, affect the process of mating.

Popa-Cordun et Stermin (PDF)

References

Ayton, P. (2005). How do men feel about women’s hair colour? A survey of male and reactions to women’s hair. Unpublished manuscript, City University, London.

Bateson, P. (1980). Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preferences in Coturnix japonica (Japanese quail), Z Tierpsychol, 53, 231-244.

Buss, D.M. (2006). Strategies of Human Mating. Phil. Topics, DOAJ, 15, 239-260.

Darwin, C. (1874). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. 2nd Ed. London, pp. 167-173.

Darwin, C., Wallace, A.R., Sarton, G., Lyell, C., & Hooker, J.D. (1930). Discovery of the Theory of Natural Selection. UcCP, 14, 133-154.

Frost, P. (2006). European hair and eye color. A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?, Evol Hum Behav, Elsevier Science, 27, 85-103.

Frost P. (2014). The puzzle of european hair, eye, and skin color. AA, Scientific Research,4, 78-88.

Janif, Z.J., Brooks, R.C., & Dixson, B.J. (2014). Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair. Biology Letters , Proc. R. Soc. Lond,10, 1-4.

Little, A.C., Penton-Voak, I.S., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D., I. (2003). Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans. Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour. Evol Hum Behav, Elsevier Science, 24, 43-51.

Lyon, B.E., & Montgomerie, R. (2012). Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 367, 2266-2273.

Parra, E.J. (2007). Human pigmentation variation: evolution, genetic basis, and implications for public health. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol., 50, 85-105.

Schweder, B.I.M. (1994). The impact of the face on long-term human relationships. Homo, 45, 74–93.

Shekar, S.N., Duffy, D.L., Frudakis, T., Montgomery, G.W., James, M.R., Sturm, R.A., & Martin, N.G. (2008). Spectrophotometric methods for quantifying pigmentation in human hair-influence of MC1R genotype and environment. Photochem. Photobiol., 84, 719-726.

Vaughn, M., Oorschot, R., & Baindur-Hudson, S. (2008). Hair color measurement and variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 137, 91–96.

Westmarck, E. (2000). The history of human marriage. Ed. Adamant Media Corporation, reprint of 1903 Ed. Macmilan and Co., Limited, London, pp. 67-73.

Wilson, G.D., & Barrett, P.T. (1987). Parental characteristics and partner choice: some evidence for Oedipal imprinting. J. Biosoc. Sci, 19, 157–161.

Zinnia, J.J., Brooks, R.C., & Dixson, B.J. (2015). Are Preferences for Women’s Hair Color Frequency-Dependent? Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol., Springer, 1, 54-71.

Published

2019-12-10

Issue

Section

Research article