Evolutionism and creationism in the social mentality – a study case in the Romanian population

Authors

  • Ioana-Mirela SZEKELY Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. * Corresponding author: ioanasze@gmail.com
  • Alexandru N. STERMIN Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-6498

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2020.1.04

Keywords:

evolutionism, creations, conservative society, religion.

Abstract

Due to the dynamic of our ever-evolving society, basically, population is now divided in two categories: one with conservative values (religion) and the other one focused on exploring the unknown (science). The aim of our study is to analyze the proportion of the two types of perspectives in the Romanian social mentality and to evaluate the participants’ attitude towards science or religion subjects. In the period between November 2016 and March 2017, questionnaires have been distributed to 400 people from Cluj-Napoca (N-W Romania) and Petroșani (S-W Romania). The questionnaire consisted of a field which evaluates personal data and a second part of 21 questions. Some of the most important results of the study included: 56% of those are religious, 71% believe in God, 55% believe that a supernatural force controls the universe, 44% consider it necessary to teach evolution in schools and 57% consider it necessary to teach religion in schools. The percentages for conservative values (religion) is 56% and those who are focused on exploring the unknown (science) is 29%.

Szekely et Stermin (PDF)

References

Alper, M. (2008). The “God” Part of the Brain: A Scientific Interpretation of Human Spirituality and God. Sourcebooks, Inc., Illinois.

Arthur, W. B., & Polak, W. (2006). The Evolution of Technology within a Simple Computer Model. Complexity at Large, Volume 11, Issue 5, USA.

Barbour, I. (1990). Religion in an Age of Science (Gifford Lectures 1989-1991, Vol 1), Harpercollins, New York.

Barnes, M. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Practices and Perspectives of College Instructors on Addressing Religious Beliefs When Teaching Evolution. CBE- Life Sciences Education, Vol. 15.

Bondarenko, D. M, Grinin, L. E., & Korotayev, A. V. (2002). Alternative Pathways of Social Evolution and Basic Principles of Culture Organization, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow.

Carlson, D. K. (2005). Americans Weigh In on Evolution vs. Creationism in Schools. Responses vary by religiosity, education, ideology [Accessed 18 March 2019] https://news.gallup.com/poll/16462/americans-weigh-evolution-vs-creationism-schools.aspx.

Cheadle, J. E., & Schwadel, P. (2012). The ‘friendship dynamics of religion,’ or the ‘religious dynamics of friendship’? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools, Social Science Research, Volume 41, Issue 5.

Coyne, J. A. (2015). Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. Ed. Viking, New York.

Einstein, M. (2008). Brands of Faith-Marketing Religion in a Commercial Age, Routledge, New York.

Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design [Accessed 18 March 2019] https://news.gallup.com/poll/21814/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx.

Global index of religion and atheism (2012) [Accessed 18 March 2019] https://sidmennt.is/wp-content/uploads/Gallup-International-um-tr%C3%BA-og-tr%C3%BAleysi-2012.pdf.

Guthrie, S. (2002). Animal animism: Evolutionary roots of religious cognition, Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion. Continuum, New York.

Heddy, B. C., & Nadelson, L. S. (2013). The variables related to public acceptance of evolution in the United States, Evolution: Education and Outreach, Vol. 6, Issue 3.

Hoover, S. M., & Clark, L. S. (2002). Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture. Columbia University Press, Columbia.

Keleman, D. (2004). Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? - Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature. Sage journal, Volume 15, Number 5.

Losos, J. B., Baum, D. A., Futuyma , D. J., Hoekstra H. E, Lenski, R. E., Moore, A. J., Peichel C. L., Schluter D., & Whitlock M. C. (2014). The Princeton Guide to Evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

Nadelson, L. S., & Hardy, H. H. (2015). Trust in science and scientists and the acceptance of evolution, Evolution: Education and Outreach, Volume 8, Issue 9.

Newport, F. (2009). On Darwin’s Birthday, Only 4 in 10 Believe in Evolution. Belief drops to 24% among frequent church attenders, [Accessed 18 March 2019] https://news.gallup.com/poll/114544/darwin-birthday-believe-evolution.aspx.

Newport, F. (2014). In U.S., 42% Believe Creationist View of Human Origins. Americans' views related to religiousness, age, education [Accessed 18 March 2019] https://news.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx.

Opaschi, V. (2014). Statul și cultele religioase, Secretariatul de Stat pentru Culte, București.

Scott, E. C. (2009). Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction, Greenwood Press, London.

Singer, P. (2006). Tratat de Etică. Ed. Polirom, Iași.

Van Ments, L., Roelofsma, P., & Treurcorresponding, J. (2018). Modelling the effect of religion on human empathy based on an adaptive temporal–causal network model. Computational Social Networks.

Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J. , Hood, R. W., Jr. , Miller, L., & Waddell, M. G. (1999). Religion and the Experiential System: Relationships of Constructive Thinking with Religious. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Volume 9, Issue 3.

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Research article